College football is one of the most beloved sports in the United States, drawing intense passion from fans, players, and alumni alike. One of the most significant developments in recent college football history is the College Football Playoff (CFP) system, which has reshaped how top teams are ranked and who qualifies for the national championship. The CFP rankings, introduced in 2014, replaced the previous Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and brought a new layer of excitement—and strategy—to the game.
This article explores the history of college football playoff rankings, the key factors influencing team rankings, and strategies to improve a team’s chances of making the playoffs. As you read more, you’ll find new exciting games to try your luck.
For decades, college football teams relied on polls, computer models, and committee selections to determine which teams would compete in the major bowl games. Here’s a quick look at the progression leading up to the current CFP rankings:
The Poll Era (1936–1997): Initially, college football rankings were determined by human polls, such as the AP (Associated Press) and Coaches’ Polls. These polls determined champions based on end-of-season rankings rather than head-to-head matchups.
The BCS Era (1998–2013): The Bowl Championship Series was introduced to create a clearer pathway to the championship game. The BCS system used a combination of human polls and computer rankings to select two teams to compete in the national title game. However, controversy remained, with many fans and analysts feeling that deserving teams were left out.
The College Football Playoff Era (2014–Present): The CFP brought a *-four-team playoff format selected by a committee that evaluates factors like strength of schedule, head-to-head competition, and other performance metrics. This change allowed more teams to compete for the national title and allowed for more nuanced assessments beyond the BCS system’s computer rankings.
The shift to the CFP system aimed to reduce controversy by including a more transparent selection process. Each week during the season, the CFP Selection Committee ranks teams based on their performance, leading up to the final rankings, which determine which teams advance to the playoffs.
*-The playoff has expanded to 12 teams, beginning this season (2024).
The CFP Selection Committee comprises a diverse group of individuals, including former coaches, athletic directors, and experts in college football. They meet weekly to assess and rank teams, using several critical factors:
Strength of Schedule: Teams that face and defeat strong opponents tend to rank higher.
Wins and Losses: While a strong record is crucial, the quality of opponents matters. A win over a top-ranked team can significantly boost a team’s ranking.
Conference Championships: Winning a conference championship can weigh heavily, particularly when comparing similar teams.
Head-to-Head Competition: If two teams are similar in rank and performance, the committee considers the result of a head-to-head matchup.
While this system has improved transparency, it still involves subjective judgments. Teams and coaches must, therefore, think strategically to strengthen their case for inclusion in the playoffs.
With the CFP’s unique blend of criteria, teams need a calculated approach to maximize their playoff chances. Here are some effective strategies teams can employ:
The strength of the schedule is one of the most critical factors in the CFP rankings. To make a strong case, teams should aim to schedule games against highly ranked opponents from Power Five conferences. Beating a reputable opponent significantly bolsters a team’s resume and can significantly impact their ranking. Conversely, a weaker schedule can harm a team’s standing, even with a strong win-loss record.
Winning games isn’t always enough; the margin of victory also plays a role. Dominant performances against lesser-ranked teams show the committee that a team can consistently control the game. Although the CFP committee doesn’t officially consider “style points,” clear wins with convincing leads demonstrate strength and often lead to a higher ranking.
Conference championships are essential to a team’s CFP resume, especially for those in Power Five conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and SEC). Winning a conference title significantly boosts a team’s credibility and often serves as a tiebreaker when comparing teams with similar records. Teams can improve their playoff chances by focusing on these high-stakes games and delivering strong performances within their conference.
The CFP committee values consistency. Teams that peak early in the season but falter toward the end may find their rankings slipping. Maintaining momentum by preparing intensely for each opponent and keeping players healthy is crucial. Moreover, a late-season victory over a highly-ranked opponent can significantly boost a team’s standing, sometimes leading to last-minute inclusion in the playoff picture.
The College Football Playoff system has brought a new intensity, excitement, and strategic planning to college football. As the rankings continue to influence the path to the national championship, teams must think critically about every game, every opponent, and every performance. Teams can maximize their playoff potential by scheduling strong opponents, winning convincingly, excelling in conference play, and building a consistent, healthy roster.